4 Ways Pop Culture Villainizes Modern Women

This article from Everyday Feminism discusses how women in the media are put into a false good girl/bad girl dichotomy, and how this all too common rhetoric puts women in competition against each other.

A History od Women In Animation

Animation has for years been a ‘boys club’. Women have found it difficult to break through into the industry. Carrie Tupper on Mary Sue wrote an article about some of the first women to join this boy’s club, which can be read here:http://www.themarysue.com/history-women-in-animation/

Part Two profiles some of the prominent modern women working in the animation industry. Often on this blog we discuss the lack of women behind the scenes in Televison and Film, so it is always nice to see women who are succeeding in this tough field.

Link  —  Posted: June 15, 2014 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

Pink and blue gender segmentation doesn’t end after childhood.


Here’s a fun game you can play the next time watch Fox & Friends — though, and I cannot stress this enough, you really should only be watching Fox & Friends to play this game or for other satirical purposes, as it’s a program with the net effect of an aluminum bat to the forehead, intellectually speaking. The game is called “Sure! If You’re a Fucking Idiot!,” and it goes like this: every time one of the Fox bobbleheads poses one of their “just asking!” questions, cheerfully reply, “Sure! If you’re a fucking idiot!” And then change the channel. (You can also play this game during most of Fox’s programming.) And on yesterday’s F&F, they posed this humdinger: “Are female breadwinners a problem?”

View original post 822 more words

The Language of Dude Feminism

Posted: April 24, 2014 in Uncategorized

The sort of language used to assert men’s dominance over women has a pretty recognizable pattern across the cultural landscape. Men, we are told, are in charge of things because they have something women (supposedly) lack: physical strength, honor, higher cognitive facilities, or the mystique of the male organ itself. Women, sadly “lacking” these qualities, need to be “protected” from the all-consuming lusts of strange men.

This can be spun as noble chivalry, brutal domination, or a playful battle of the sexes, but at the root it’s the same: women are denied the freedoms that men take as a God-given right, assigned subordinate status, and coerced into performative gender roles.

In this dialectic, men’s protective abilities and ravaging urges come from the same place and are both aimed squarely at women. Language, of course, did not create the patriarchy, but language is a powerful method of inscribing the possible, shaping…

View original post 580 more words

Jessica Rey discusses the Bikini and how men react to seeing women in them. Rey cites a Princeton study that reveals the objectifying way men view women who are scantily clad.
To see her swimwear line: http://www.reyswimwear.com/

Video  —  Posted: April 23, 2014 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,

Celi-bratory Thoughts


As I mentioned before, I identify myself as a feminist. I believe a feminist is a person who wants political, social, and economical equality for both sexes. Sometimes I have to remember that, because in my frenzy to demand respect, I often times lose sight of my goal and alienate and disvalue the problems of men that also result from societal norms that need to be torn down. But that is a story for later.

Now, my reason for straying away from blogging my writing journey is because I watched Game of Thrones last night. For those not aware, I love Game of Thrones, and believe it to be one of the best shows written in the history of ever. When I hear the theme song, I get so pumped up. When Dany speaks Valaryian, I get so excited, I feel like I need to punch a wall to cool…

View original post 739 more words

Reality Television in 2014 is no longer a guilty pleasure, it’s engrained into our culture. We talk about Honey Boo Boo, The Housewives of anywhere, 16 and Pregnant, and The Bachelor freely even if it is only to marvel at the train wrecks that are occurring from week to week we are invested in the lives of these people. I’ve seen passionate arguments that looked capable of ending friendships over disagreements about who should win American Idol. It can no longer be argued that these shows do not impact our culture when information about people on these shows is discussed on major news networks and made fun of on Saturday Night Live. In Reality Bites Back Jennifer L. Pozner explores the societal implications and influences of reality television on our perception of women. She argues that these shows have ingrained archaic ideals about beauty, love, ethnicity, class, and gender roles that have been detrimental to the forward movement of women in our society.
Pozner repeatedly addresses the common argument that it’s television and that we shouldn’t be taking television seriously by pointing out that these directors and producers are presenting their shows as reality which strips away the disconnect that audiences can maintain in a sitcom or tv drama. The actual reality of the situation is that what is shown on television is not what is happening on the show, everything is manipulated at the will of the producers and directors. In an interview with NPR an anonymous Bachelor producer said, “We have even gone so far as to ‘frankenbite,’ where you take somebody saying, ‘of course I’d like to say that I love him’ and cutting the bite together to say ‘of course I love him’… [It’s] misleading to the viewer and unfair to the cast member, but they sign up for this.” (Brownstein 2008). The existence of “frankenbites” proves that the directors and producers are constructing the reality they want the audience to see whether it’s that this girl is completely in love with a man she met two days ago or if it’s a girl who is in a catfight with her fellow cast member.
One of the troubling aspects of “reality” that these shows present deals with women and beauty. Pozner discusses shows like America’s Next Top Model, The Bachelor, Extreme Makeover, and What Not to Wear. She points out that all of these show emphasize beauty as the thin and white girl. The shows repeatedly show that if a woman does not meet this ideal she either has to take extreme measures to make herself look like that through risky elective procedure or she is going to be unhappy and unloved for the rest of her life.
There is also a focus on the entertainment of seeing women humiliated and crying. Pozner discusses the agendas of the producers of these shows saying that producers like Richard Fleiss “base shows on the desire to make woman extremely unhappy.” (Pozner 24) She even gets a statement from Fleiss in which he admitted: “It’s a lot of fun to watch girls crying,… Never underestimate the value of that.” Pozner goes on to discuss one show’s mistreatment and humiliation. On Fox’s Married by America a bride is left at the altar after going through the planning of her dream wedding while the audience watching knows that the groom is going to dump her. Pozner is brutal in her description of the woman’s devastation and humiliation at the hands of these producers, “The money shot in porn flicks usually involves male ejaculation. In reality TV dating shows, it comes when cameras zoom in on the tear-soaked face of some woman shattered by romantic rejection.” (53).
Audiences aren’t troubled by this treatment of women according to Pozner because the idea that they are “’real people’ behaving as they normally would in ‘real life,’ the none-too-subtle implication is that women in general may not deserve any more respect than is shown to the ones on the TV.” (56). The treatment of these woman has the potential to warp the ideals of how women themselves expect to be treated in romantic relationships. We as the audience need to keep in mind the scripting, frankenbiting, and overall fictional aspects of reality television. Just observe any cast on a reality show and you won’t see a diverse group that actually represents America’s reality, instead you will get three kinds of women according to Pozner: “Bitches and Morons and Skanks, Oh My!” is the title of chapter three in this book. She explores the limited views we get of women and how if there is any variation in race or sexual orientation those aspects are exploited in unflattering, two-dimensional ways. Especially for women of color who are only depicted as beautiful when they happen to look like their white counterparts with lighter skin and straight hair. Dark skin, kinky hair, almond-shaped eyes, wide noses are all viewed as undesirable in these shows and if cast member have any of these qualities they are turned into to a caricature of their race.
The overall goal of Pozner for this work is to analyze how reality television defines “Women” and the ideals on gender roles in relation to body, romance, marriage, home, and work. She emphasizes the reminder that “ ‘Woman’ is not a monolithic group” (21). It is important to understand reality television’s antifeminism because it is detrimental to the progression of women as leaders who are to be respected in our society. When a moderator sees no issue with asking two woman running for the United States Senate about their opinions on the erotic novel Fifty Shades of Gray we have a problem and that problem desperately needs to be addressed and fixed in our media.

Image  —  Posted: April 21, 2014 in Uncategorized
Tags: , ,

Enlightened Sexism Book Review

This is my review for the Susan J. Douglas’s Book Enlightened Sexism. Within it she touches upon how that society as well as the media can be somewhat dissmissive of women, especially feminism. She talks about how the use of “enlightened sexism” can be destructive towards equality amongst the genders, when it is not preceived as such, something that is truly frightening.

Image  —  Posted: April 21, 2014 in Uncategorized
Tags: , ,

Glamorizing Eating Disorders

Posted: April 21, 2014 in Uncategorized

Glamorizing Eating Disorders.